Re: [PATCH/RFC] rev-list: add --authorship-order alternative ordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elliott Cable <me@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> elliottcable <me@xxxxxx> writes:
>>> Thus, I've added an --authorship-order version of --date-order, which relies
>>> upon the AUTHOR_DATE instead of the COMMITTER_DATE; this means that old commits
>>> will continue to show up chronologically in-order despite rebasing.
>>> ---
>>
>> Missing sign-off.  Please see Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
>
> Will-do.
>
> I read that part, and was rather confused. At no point did I get the
> idea that I should sign-off *my own initial commit*. Perhaps that part
> of the documentation needs to be slightly re-written? Would that be a
> welcome change?

I fail to see what more needs to be clarified on top of what we
already have; please re-read "(5) Sign your work" section, paying
with special attention to:

 - "YOU WROTE IT or otherwise have the right to pass it on".

 - "the contribution was created in whole or in part BY ME and I
   HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUBMIT".

But perhaps you meant something else by "*my own initial commit*"???
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]