Re: [PATCH 10/15] for-each-ref: introduce format specifier %>(*) and %<(*)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duy Nguyen wrote:
> I mentioned it before and I do it again. This is not optimal.

Yeah, I'll attempt to fix this, but it's not urgent.

> But I guess it's ok in this
> shape unless you run this over hundreds of refs.

Oh, you can run over a hundred refs just fine, for scripting purposes;
but why would you want to run over a hundred refs with a pretty that
includes %>(*) or %<(*)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]