On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Duy and I have been working on this topic for some time now. Here's a > review candidate. I'm still hung up one the detached HEAD thing. It's a bit quirky to put in for-each-ref, but for-each-ref can't truly replace branch --list until it can display detached HEAD. But I think we can finish this part and get it in first. Should be useful for some people already. > Duy is currently writing code to factor out -v[v] and adding --sort, > --count to git-branch, but I'm having a lot of difficulty working with > a series of this size. I'm leaning towards getting this merged before > tackling branch (who wants to review a 40-part series?). Especially > after [14/15] and [15/15], git for-each-ref should be usable in its > own right. Agreed (a bit of concern about 14 and 15/15, though). Signed-off-by: me for the whole series. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html