Re: [PATCH 3/4] unpack-trees: trivial cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> dfc has not been initialized at this point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Upon the first entry to this function, because dfc is 

	static struct cache_entry *dfc;

it is NULL.  In that case, we allocate one instance.  When the
function is called again, we can reuse the entry, because it merely
acts as a unique sentinel value.

And we do not free() it.

>  unpack-trees.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> index ede4299..36f4ff7 100644
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -1040,8 +1040,7 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options
>  	if (!o->skip_sparse_checkout)
>  		mark_new_skip_worktree(o->el, o->src_index, 0, CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE);
>  
> -	if (!dfc)
> -		dfc = xcalloc(1, cache_entry_size(0));
> +	dfc = xcalloc(1, cache_entry_size(0));
>  	o->df_conflict_entry = dfc;
>  
>  	if (len) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]