Re: [PATCH] run-command: simplify wait_or_whine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, and last year we returned a different code. The world didn't
> end, because nobody is checking for the specific code. But if you want
> to retain complexity forever, suit yourselves.

And that was changed for a reason, compared to this change "because I
like it". I maintain my NAK (not that it matters) until you justify
your change better than "nobody is using it".

> commit 709ca730f8e093005cc882bfb86c0ca9c83d345b
> Author: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Sat Jan 5 09:49:49 2013 -0500
>
>     run-command: encode signal death as a positive integer
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]