Re: [PATCH 2/4] remote-helpers: rename tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> I do not see how it makes sense to copy how they deviate from us
>>> back to our codebase, especially if we plan to eventually move some
>>> of these tests out of contrib/ area, but even without such a plan in
>>> the future.
>>
>> They deviate from us, we deviate from them, whatever. We are a single project,
>> what more than one project does is more standard.
>
> We are a single project, so it is better to consistently follow the
> local convention established here.
>
> If your proposal were to
>
>  - Convert t/*.sh to end with .t intead, to change the project
>    convention, and
>
>  - Make contrib/ things also conform to that new convention.
>
> it may make some sense to discuss the pros and cons of such a move,
> but changing only contrib/ has no effect other than making it even
> less consistent with the rest of the project.

It's already inconsistent with the rest of the project, as they are
not named tNNNN-foo.sh.

If you want I can give it a try at renaming all the tests in the whole
project to *.t, but I don't think you are truly interested in finding
a better extension for our tests.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]