Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> Feel free to implement that. I'm just interested in 'git cherry-pick' being
>>> usable for 'git rebase' purposes.
>>
>> Which would have been obvious to all but the most casual readers, eh?
>
> My motivations are irrelevant, the patch is good as it is.
You fooled both Junio (AFAICT anyway) and me, who both reviewed the
patch under the assumption that it implements note copying *along the
lines of existing note copying*. This proved to be a wrong, and
time-wasting, assumption.
I think all the points in this discussion have been made in the lengthy
thread about remote-{bzr,hg} already. So much so in fact that your
continuing defiance of the project standards, knowing that they will
elicit exactly this response, amounts to trolling.
So until this changes, my $0.02 is a blanket NAK and a refusal to spend
my time reviewing.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html