Re: [PATCH 3/5] rebase: fix sequence continuation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > We are not in am mode.
> 
> That may make sense, but shouldn't this part be like so from the
> very beginning?  In other words, this looks like an "oops, 1/5 was
> buggy and this is a hotfix".

How can 1/5 be introducing a bug? It's merely splitting the code without
introducing *ANY* functional changes.

The bug is already there in 'master'.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]