Re: [PATCH] fetch: don't try to update unfetched tracking refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:40:25PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:

> Since commit f269048 (fetch: opportunistically update tracking refs,
> 2013-05-11) we update tracking refs opportunistically when fetching
> remote branches.  However, if a refspec is given on the command line
> that does not include a configured (non-pattern) refspec a fatal error
> occurs.

I'm not sure I understand what the last sentence means. I tried to add a
test like:

diff --git a/t/t5510-fetch.sh b/t/t5510-fetch.sh
index ff43e08..02e30e1 100755
--- a/t/t5510-fetch.sh
+++ b/t/t5510-fetch.sh
@@ -422,6 +422,16 @@ test_expect_success 'configured fetch updates tracking' '
 	)
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'non-configured ref does not confuse tracking update' '
+	cd "$D" &&
+	git update-ref refs/odd/location HEAD &&
+	(
+		cd three &&
+		git fetch origin refs/odd/location &&
+		git rev-parse --verify FETCH_HEAD
+	)
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'pushing nonexistent branch by mistake should not segv' '
 
 	cd "$D" &&

but it does not fail with the existing code. Can you give an example
that fails?

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]