Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Towards a useable git-branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I am having this feeling that we see more and more of this line of
> bad behaviours from some on the list recently to call something that
> is working in which they find itch using unnecessarily derogatory
> terms, and it makes people simply avoid any discussion that starts
> with such an attitude.
>
> Unnecessary negativity is not productive and it has to stop.

My apologies.  After all, we have all been using 'git branch' for so
many years without complaining.  I only noticed the itch recently:
it's a burning itch that I want it to be fixed very badly (hence the
series).  If anything I intended to convey the importance of the patch
to me personally, not about some "general truth" on the broken-ness of
git-branch.

Ofcourse I will take your suggestion and tone down, because I don't
want the git community to feel bad about the software they're
developing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]