Re: [PATCH 7/7] sha1_name: implement finding @{push}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Try this now: configure your current branch's pushremote to push to
>> "refs/heads/*:refs/heads/rr/*".  Now, type 'git show @{p}'.  Voila!
>
> Voila what? Why not avoid guessing game and describe what the patch is for?

If you're on branch master, it'll output refs/heads/rr/master.  The
topic is about having a @{push} corresponding to @{upstream}

>> +static void find_push_ref(struct branch *branch) {
>> +       struct remote *remote = pushremote_get(NULL);
>> +       const struct refspec *pat = NULL;
>> +       char raw_ref[PATH_MAX];
>> +       struct ref *this_ref;
>> +       char *dst_name;
>> +       int len;
>> +
>> +       sprintf(raw_ref, "refs/heads/%s", branch->name);
>> +       len = strlen(raw_ref) + 1;
>> +       this_ref = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*this_ref) + len);
>> +       memcpy(this_ref->name, raw_ref, len);
>> +
>> +       dst_name = get_ref_match(remote->push, remote->push_refspec_nr,
>> +                               this_ref, MATCH_REFS_ALL, 0, &pat);
>> +       printf("dst_name = %s\n", dst_name);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Isn't this an abuse of extended sha-1 syntax? How can I combine this
> with other @{}, ^, ~...?

I'm unsure what you mean.  How can I be on branch master^1?  Did you
read the cover-letter?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]