Re: [PATCH 08/17] revision: split some overly-long lines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 05/21/2013 07:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  revision.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>>>  revision.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>> 
>> Looks obviously good for *.c file, but I am on the fence for *.h
>> one, as the reason we kept these long single lines in *.h files was
>> to help those who want to grep in *.h files to let them view the
>> full function signature.  It probably is OK to tell them to use
>> "git grep -A$n" instead, though.
>
> My goal with this patch was not to set a new policy but rather just to
> make the code conform a little better to the existing policy as
> described in CodingGuidelines.  *If* it is preferred that header files
> list all parameters on a single line, then by all means adjust the
> CodingGuidelines and I will just as happily make header files conform to
> *that* policy when I touch them :-)
>
> (That being said, my personal preference is to apply the 80-character
> limit for header files too.)

Yeah, that is why I said "I am on the fence but it probably is OK to
break" the unwritten but guessable rule.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]