Re: [PATCH 5/9] for-each-ref: add %(tracking[:upstream]) for tracking info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> Exactly. I already explained why %(upstream) can't be used in 00/09.
>> "tracking" may not be perfect. Somebody might want
>> "tracking:upstream:short". It does not look quite nice.
>
> Which is why I suggested keeping upstream, upstream:short, and
> introducing upstream:diff and upstream:shortdiff (or :tracking if you
> prefer that) in [0/9].

Yeah, but there won't be any upstream in %(tracking). Besides, if we
manage to get downstream, we could do %(tracking:downstream). I think
%(tracking) and %(short:tracking) make sense.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]