Re: Random thoughts on "upstream"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> I guess what I'm saying is: refspec semantics are inherent properties
> of the remote, not of the local branch.

[remote "ram"]
    push = refs/heads/link:refs/heads/for-junio/link

is saying: if the branch name matches "link", push it to for-junio/link.

[branch "link"]
    push = refs/heads/for-junio/link

is saying: push _this_ branch to for-junio/link, irrespective of what
it is called.

An example illustrating this clearly:

# on branch link-v2
# work ...
$ git push
# work ...
# ok, I'm ready to replace link
$ git branch -M link
$ git push
# where should the push go?

Also: putting branch-specific configuration in remote.<name>.push
would mean that it can potentially accumulate a lot of cruft from
deleted branches.  It's the same kind problem we face with .gitignore,
no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]