Re: [PATCH 7/8] remote-bzr: reorganize the way 'wanted' works

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The series fails to apply (on top of the hotfix for 1.8.3 you sent
> earlier today) at this point.  It wants to remove the code added by
> the hotfix but I do not see a corresponding check for listable,
> which may make sense, as the log message says, when the user
> specified a list of branches:
>
>     If the user specified a list of branches, we ignore what the remote
>     repository lists, and simply use the branches directly. Since some
>     remotes don't report the branches correctly, this is useful.
>
> but it is unclear if the listable code needs to go somewhere else
> when the user didn't.
>
> I'll stop at 6/8 for now, as this is not urgent before the 1.8.3
> release.

I can send the conflict fix, or I can send a v2 of the 47-something
patches. I already have a few fixes on top that might make sense to
squash. Up to you.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]