On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> [remote "origin"]
>>> push = refs/heads/master:refs/heads/fc/master
>>>
>>> [remote "."]
>>> push = refs/heads/fc/old-remote/hg:refs/heads/fc/remote/hg
>
> Major thinko. It should be:
>
> [remote "github"]
> push = refs/heads/master:refs/heads/fc/master
> push = refs/heads/fc/old-remote/hg:refs/heads/fc/remote/hg
Would I be able to do:
% git branch --set-upstream-to origin/master --set-downstream-to
github/fc/master
?
Would I see these branches when I do 'git branch -vv'?
Would I be able to do 'git push next@{downstream}'?
>>> Advantage being you can do:
>>>
>>> [remote "origin"]
>>> push = refs/heads/*:refs/for/*
>>>
>>> While you can't with branch.<name>.push.
>>
>> But I can do 'git push origin "refs/head/*:refs/heads/for/*"', not
>> that I've ever had the need to do something like that, so I don't
>> care.
>
> Isn't the entire point of this exercise getting git to dwim without
> being explicit?
>
> I don't care about it personally either, which is why I haven't
> written a patch yet. However, there are users of Gerrit who would
> appreciate this feature: in the remote.pushdefault thread, some people
> requested this feature.
That is orthogonal to 'branch.A.push' the same way 'remote.B.fetch' is
orthogonal to 'branch.A.merge'.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html