Johan Herland wrote: > The disambiguation can probably be resolved, although the resulting > code will obviously be somewhat more cumbersome and ugly (and IMHO the > current code is plenty of that already...). Combine this with the > problems of clobbering of the same remote-tracking ref (describe > above), and the fact that AFAIK a multi-level remote name has never > been observed "in the wild" (none of the people I asked at the Git > Merge conference had ever observed multi-level remote names, nor did > they directly oppose banning them), I'm not at all sure it's worth > bothering about this at all. Simply disallowing multi-level remote > names seems like the simpler and naturally ambiguity-resistant > approach. The problem with multi-level remote names is that we use the same delimiter as in the ref namespace: '/'. So, obviously, there's a lot of room for confusion. I wonder if we should banish multi-level remotes altogether though: is it possible that they will be useful to someone in the future? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html