On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> "refs/remotes/%1/%2" (or "refs/remotes/%1/%*") might be a nice way to >> imply that the rule should only be attempted if the input has at least >> two components, whereas something like "refs/heads/%*" would be applied >> even for inputs with no slashes. > > /me likes, at least for "refs/remotes/%1/%*". Unfortunately, using "refs/remotes/%1/%*" instead of "refs/remotes/%*" breaks a number of git-svn tests which puts refs directly within refs/remotes/, and then does things like "git reset --hard trunk" (expecting trunk -> refs/remotes/trunk, which the refs/remotes/%1/%* doesn't match). I don't know if putting refs directly within refs/remotes/ is something that git-svn does by default (which would prevent us from changing "refs/remotes/%*" to "refs/remotes/%1/%*"), or whether it is specific to the tests (in which case we should fix the tests). Also, there might be too many other users of refs directly within refs/remotes/ that expect "foo_without_slash" to expand to "refs/remotes/foo_without_slash", which would prevent us from doing this change. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html