On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>>> And the clone would happen either way, with or without this patch, >>>>> because 'hg/origin/master' doesn't exist, the only purpose 'hg/origin' >>>>> serves is to block the new feature. >>>> >>>> That is the answer I was trying to extract out of you (I take the hg >>>> is a typo for bzr in the above, though). >>> >>> Just to double check, I understand that the justification for >>> removal is this: >>> >>> If a clone exists with the old organization (v1.8.2) it will prevent the >>> new shared repository organization from working, so let's remove this >>> -repository, which is not used any more. >>> +repository. It is not used by 1.8.3, and did not host any useful >>> +information in the code in 1.8.2. >> >> That is not true. It did host useful information in 1.8.2, if we apply >> this and the user tries to pull with remote-bzr from 1.8.2, it would >> need to be cloned again. > > So the answer to my original question: > > So we nuke that and have them clone from scratch? No, as I already explained the "cloning from scratch" is already happening with or without this patch. All this change does is remove a repository that is not used any more in order to allow a feature that was already introduced, and that's exactly what the commit message says. It doesn't cause any other change. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html