Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] remote-hg: fixes and cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Since the last series is not merged to master yet, I decided to add more cleanups.
>
> Because nothing new will go to 'master' past -rc1 by default, unless
> you are working on fixing or finding 1.8.3 regressions, this is a
> good time to polish things that are meant for the next cycle.

I know, I've been polishing a bunch of patches for the next cycle for
a long time.

> Folks interested in working remote-hg, please try it out, so that we
> can have a polished one soon after 1.8.3 ships (I am not saying this
> round is not polished---I haven't even looked at the patches).
>
> And others, please spend time on testing the 1.8.3-rc2 to make sure
> what we are going to ship is free of embarrassing regressions.

The whole purpose of this series is to avoid regressions, that's why I
sent them for 1.8.3. I thought I made it clear[1] that we would want
these patches in, to avoid regressions, unless it's desirable that we
end up pushing garbage to a remote repository.

Cheers.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/224224

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]