Re: [PATCH] honor GIT_REFLOG_ACTION in git-commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This allows git-cherry-pick and git-revert to properly identify
>> themselves in the resulting reflog entries.  Earlier they were
>> recorded as what git-commit has done.
>
> Not sure how I missed that one when I introduced GIT_REFLOG_ACTION,
> but thanks for finding and fixing it.  :-)

The fact that it went unnoticed for this long time shows how we
lack proper tools to read the message part of the reflog,
although we use @{N} and @{ago} notation every day and some
people might even rely on it.  I'd like to do something about
it, and my earlier "show-branch --reflog" enhancement series
(I'll park that in 'next' for now) was my attempt for that goal.

I found this out by accident while working on it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]