Re: git ls-files -o under .git/ prints all repository files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 14:30 +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Alex Riesen wrote:
> > On 1/19/07, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> % cd .hg && hg status -A .
> >> abort: path contains illegal component: .hg
> >>
> >> I think this is a sensible thing to do.
> > 
> > No, it isn't. It is not unlikely to have repo in repo
> > (and some people already have them).
> > Mercurial is wrong here.
> 
> For managing repos inside repos (onion repos?) I think it should
> be safe to abort if we're not at top-level.
> 


Why not check for /.git/ somewhere inside the current working directory
(pwd) ? That's the way mercurial does it currently, and I think that is
a sane thing to do _if_ you want to protect the user from his own
stupidity.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]