Re: [PATCH 0/2] Better advice on merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01-05-2013 23:57, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
  - It would be nice to add a test under t/


Thanks, I'll do that.

  - Since the first patch isn't useful without or logically separate
    from the second, this would probably be easier to read as a single
    patch.


They are logically separate, even if the first isn't useful without the second. I wanted to segregate the task of defining a helper function that corrects the ref name, and changing the parts of the code that should use it. The reason the second is separate is that once the first is in place, even commands like 'checkout' can use the helper function.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]