On 1 May 2013 11:12, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So HEAD@{0}~0^0 is too much to type, but we can remove '^0', and we can
>> remove '~0', and we can remove 'HEAD', which leaves us with @{0}, but we
>> can't remove '{0}'?
>>
>> This patch allows '@' to be the same as 'HEAD'.
>>
>> So now we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness.
>>
>> Until now '@' was a valid name, but it conflicts with this idea, so lets
>
> s/lets/let's/ (contraction of "let us")
Ah, the contraction versus the first person singular. In this case
where the context is concluding in decision, rather than making a
statement ("Let's go to the shops", for example) then "lets" is the
correct word to use here.
-- Thomas Adam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html