Re: [PATCH] refs.c: interpret @ as HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> @{-1}@{0} does.  That means @{0} is a revision and not a ref, but @{-1}
>> is.
>
> Right.  I missed that.
>
>> '"@" given alone' has to be a ref if we want @@{5.minutes.ago} to
>> resolve.
>
> Yeah, I just realized that it's a bug in the @{u} implementation.

I don't think so. You probably need to modify branch_get(), because it
has a special case for "HEAD", and who knows if it's hard-coded in
other places. It's not just the @{u} implementation.

If we do the magic at the rev-parsing phase, all these details become
irrelevant.

FTR. @@{upstream} and @@{now} works just fine in v2 of my patch series.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]