Re: [PATCH] refs.c: interpret @ as HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Rast wrote:
> But then why don't you just 'git symbolic-ref H HEAD' for a sort of
> "local alias"?

Yes, I already have @ pointing to HEAD.  And I think it's much nicer
than H (also since H@{u} doesn't resolve [1]).  The purpose of this
patch is to standardize @ for everyone.

> What annoys me more is that there's no way to say
>
>   git symbolic-ref U @{u}

That's because the part after "ref: " in a symref is expected to point
to a concrete ref, and doesn't go through the get_sha1_basic()
machinery.  Making symrefs peel recursively might or might not be a
good idea; I haven't thought about it enough.  However, it's not my
itch: write a patch and start a discussion?

[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/222852/focus=222916
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]