Re: [PATCH] Add new @ shortcut for HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> diff --git a/t/t1503-rev-parse-verify.sh b/t/t1503-rev-parse-verify.sh
> index 813cc1b..426c63f 100755
> --- a/t/t1503-rev-parse-verify.sh
> +++ b/t/t1503-rev-parse-verify.sh
> @@ -115,4 +115,13 @@ test_expect_success 'master@{n} for various n' '
>  	test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify master@{$Np1}
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'empty @' '
> +	rev_hash=$(git rev-parse --verify @) &&
> +	test "$rev_hash" = "$HASH4" &&
> +	rev_hash=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD@) &&
> +	test "$rev_hash" = "$HASH4" &&
> +	rev_hash=$(git rev-parse --verify master@) &&
> +	test "$rev_hash" = "$HASH4"
> +'

Don't we have different refs that resolve to something other than
$HASH4 at this point in the test?  Otherwise we wouldn't notice a
breakage because we cannot tell if HEAD@ and master@ are interpreted
correctly or all of these happen to yield $HASH4 because a version
somebody else patches to break the implementation in this patch
discards any string before @ that is not followed by {stuff}.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]