On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:06:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:30:18AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> I'm all for calling this command "stg rebase". > > > > After all, my current implementation as "pull --to" mostly bypasses > > the fetch, so it probably makes sense to use a new command. > > > > However, "stg rebase <target>" does not sound right. I'm not very > > happy with "stg rebaseto <target>" (or rebase-to) either. > > I think something 'stg rebase <newbase>' sounds OK. It's just that it sounds more natural to me to give as instruction "do rebase (current stack) to that point" than "do rebase that point", which "rebase <newbase>" would seem to imply. Best reagards, -- Yann. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html