Re: [PATCH 0/5] Documentation/git-diff.txt improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I had an impression that many of them, with the suggested fix-ups,
> were improvements, with or without the A~B discussion.  It seems
> that the entire review wasted many braincycles if you are to drop
> the ball at this point, which is very dissapointing.

No, I don't meant to drop the ball at all.  I'm _very_ annoyed by this
inconsistency, and have a burning desire to fix it.  It's just that I
don't want to fixup something now and regret it later, so I'm putting
it off until the A~B issue gets resolved.  In the meantime, the first
two patches are fine and can be applied as is.

> I do not appreciate "Nothing to resubmit".  [1/5] needs fixes to the
> issue Jonathan pointed out, doesn't it?

Oh, I thought it was fairly trivial and that you'd fix it up locally.
Would you like me to resend with the fixup?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]