I originally posted this as a question about getting `git log` to output the same thing that `git describe` does to the git-users mailing list, and was directed here. The actual thing I want to do is something like this: static const char *project_version = "$Format:...$"; where "..." is something that `git archive` will replace with the output of `git describe`, given the file has the export-subst property, possibly with arguments to git describe (--tags, --all, etc.). In a normal build I can do this with the build system just calling git directly, but if I'm archiving a tarball off there doesn't seem to be a way to do this (other than manually replacing the format string myself as some secondary step). Does this seem like a reasonable thing to do, or am I overlooking a better alternative? If this is something that seems reasonable, I wouldn't mind taking a stab at implementing it. If that sounds okay, could make sure I'm pointed in the right direction? E.g., should `git log --format=...` have options that spit out `git describe` strings since that's what export-subst currently uses, or should there be a separate $Format:...$ option that runs git describe? Thanks, John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html