Re: [PATCH] fixup! t3210: test for spurious error messages for dangling packed refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/24/2013 05:25 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 07:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Let me know if you would prefer that I re-roll.
>>
>> Your fix-up cleanly applied to the result of applying the series up
>> to 16/33 and it was trivial to squash it in.
>>
>> Please holler if what I push out on 'pu' in 8 hours or so looks
>> wrong.
> 
> It looks like you did the right thing, except using v1 of my patch
> series rather than v2.  Please do the same procedure with v2: apply the
> v2 series on top of jc/prune-all, apply the fixup commit "fixup! t3210",
> and rebase the fixup to autosquash it onto patch 16/33.

The new version (0859ff6fe6) that I just fetched from you looks right.

Thanks!
Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]