Re: [PATCH 12/20] remote-bzr: split marks file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> And in case anybody is thinking that remote-bzr is really a too fast
>> moving target; even if this managed to land in 'master', it's likely
>> that people were not able to push at all, and in fact, many were not
>> even able to clone in 1.8.2. So, hardly could be considered a
>> regression. Nevertheless, I caught it in time.
>
> You didn't.  I am already way too deep into today's 1.8.3-rc0
> integration cycle and I won't waste a couple of hours work just to
> revert this.

All right, if you already merged this patch series, you could do what
I did in my public branch: revert it, it's a single command, doesn't
take hours.

But I don't see this series in origin/master, am I missing something?

> But from your description it sounds like with or without the patch
> the helper is equally broken and it does not make that much of a
> difference.

Indeed. Many people would need this patch series to push, and this
patch breaks the push for more than one remote. So if you merged the
whole thing quite likely their situation would improve; they could at
least push to one remote, instead of zero. Of course, if you remove
this patch, they would be able to push to many.

But I don't see it merged.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]