Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] remote-helpers: fixes and cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Updated the commit messages, so we say Bazaar instead of Mercurial, and stuff.
>>
>> Here's a bunch of cleanups mostly to synchronize remote-bzr and remote-hg.
>
> Thanks.  Will queue on 'pu' without looking.

Actually, I was going to merge fc/remote-hg and fc/remote-bzr down
to master anyway, so I'll just apply them directly on 'master'.

By the way, I personally do not think the quality of the changes to
remote-bzr matters all that much at this point in its history.  It's
not like millions of people use it heavily from the v1.8.2 release.
A huge patch series from its original author and nobody else, either
reviewed or unreviwed, would not hurt them more than the one in the
v1.8.2 version anyway. And it is also not like bzr-to-git population
will grow significantly in the future to require us to pile a lot of
features on remote-bzr that makes the maintenance burden of it
becomes an issue.

Am I underestimating the pain of potentially breaking existing
remote-bzr userbase?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]