Re: [PATCH] remote-bzr: use proper push method

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> My gut feeling is that we should do it the way the Bazaar UI does it,
> I don't have any evidence that there's anything wrong with the current
> code, which Bazaar seems to but have, but for different purposes which
> are hard to explain. I would rather avoid surprises.

That is actually a very fine description for this change ;-).

commit 473b7aac9f542dc22cfff0c264e96d8dbbd9d895
Author: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Apr 25 06:25:37 2013 -0500

    remote-bzr: use proper push method
    
    Do not just randomly synchronize the revisions with no checks at
    all.
    
    I don't have any evidence that there's anything wrong with the
    current code, which Bazaar seems to use, but for different purposes.
    Let's use the logic Bazaar UI uses to avoid surprises.
    
    Also, add a non-ff check.
    
    Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]