On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>>> ... >>>> + git for-each-ref --format='%(refname) %(objectname)' | >>>> + while read ref a >>>> do >>>> - test $a == $b && continue >>>> + case "$before" in >>>> + *"$ref $a"*) >>>> + continue >>> >> I wonder if we should bother with this at all. The purpose of the code >> was mainly to show to users that they should report the success only >> if the refs have been updated, but the code is becoming more >> obfuscated, a comment should do the trick. And then, we can just >> report success for all the refs (and explain in the comment why). > > Are you proposing to say "ok $ref" to everything we see in the > resulting repository, even the ones the caller of remote-testgit did > not ask us to do anything with? > > Wouldn't the caller be surprised if we did so? Why would it? The only effective difference is what you'll see reported in the UI, but there's no user here. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html