Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make --full-history consider more merges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Bracey <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 25/04/2013 04:59, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>>> So, given all that, revised patch below:
>> I tried to squeeze the minimum test I sent $gmane/220919 to the test
>> suite.  I think the "do not use --parents option for this test"
>> switch needs to be cleaned up a bit more, but it fails without your
>> patch and does pass with your patch.
>>
>> I somehow was hoping that your fix to TREESAME semantics would also
>> correct the known breakage documented in that test, but it seems
>> that I was too greedy ;-)
> Thanks for the test addition. Maybe we will be able to satisfy your
> greed in this series. There could be more worth doing here, and I
> think getting TREESAME precise is key.

It is perfectly fine to do things one step at a time.  Let's get
the --full-history change into a good shape first and worry about
the more complex case after we are done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]