From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:54 PM
Thomas Rast wrote:
There is a market for a rename detection that works at the tree
level.
Exactly. And making it auto-follow with a low threshold would be a
great default. We'll have to deal with D/F conflicts that Junio was
talking about in (2), every once in a while. We'll have a lot more
incentive to build the D/F conflict resolution process a nice UI.
git-core will actually start working with trees the way it works with
blobs.
--
Is this not similar to the previous attempts at bulk rename detection?
Such as $gmane/160233.
A practical bulk rename detection would be good. It doesn't have to be
perfect.
Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html