Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > was checking it out: a 'git log <pathspec>', when referring to a file > inside the subtree, doesn't work as expected: it only displays the > HEAD commit. This is somehow expected: the subtree merge changed the filename during merge (it is subtree/file.txt after the merge, and just file.txt before), so "git log" without --follow just considers the file appeared. OTOH, I think this is a known limitation of "git log --follow" that it does not follow renames done by subtree merges. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html