[PATCHv3 0/8] Improving the search for remote-tracking branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

This is third iteration of this series. The only difference from v2 is
improved test code (in patches #1 and #2) thanks to Jonathan Nieder,
and Eric Wong's ACK to patch #6.

Have fun! :)

...Johan


Johan Herland (8):
  t2024: Add tests verifying current DWIM behavior of 'git checkout <branch>'
  t2024: Show failure to use refspec when DWIMming remote branch names
  checkout: Use remote refspecs when DWIMming tracking branches
  t3200.39: tracking setup should fail if there is no matching refspec.
  t7201.24: Add refspec to keep --track working
  t9114.2: Don't use --track option against "svn-remote"-tracking branches
  branch.c: Validate tracking branches with refspecs instead of refs/remotes/*
  glossary: Update and rephrase the definition of a remote-tracking branch

 Documentation/git-checkout.txt     |   6 +-
 Documentation/glossary-content.txt |  13 +--
 branch.c                           |  17 +++-
 builtin/checkout.c                 |  42 +++++-----
 t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh           | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/t3200-branch.sh                  |   8 +-
 t/t7201-co.sh                      |   1 +
 t/t9114-git-svn-dcommit-merge.sh   |   2 +-
 8 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh

-- 
1.8.1.3.704.g33f7d4f

>From fcab754f6702ea2724258dacd40803943db1e172 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:28:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/8] Improving the search for remote-tracking branches

Hi,

This is second iteration of this series. The initial three patches are
unchanged, although the commit message of #3 has been rephrased based
on Junio's comments.

Patches #4-#6 fixes existing tests in preparation for patch #7, which
changes the validation of the remote-tracking branch passed to --track:
We now require the --track argument to refer to a ref that matches a
configured refspec - otherwise, we can not reliably deduce the upstream
information to store into branch.<name>.remote and branch.<name>.merge.

Finally, patch #8 updates the paragraph on remote-tracking branches in
the glossary to be somewhat closer to the current state of things.


Have fun! :)

...Johan


Johan Herland (8):
  t2024: Add tests verifying current DWIM behavior of 'git checkout <branch>'
  t2024: Show failure to use refspec when DWIMming remote branch names
  checkout: Use remote refspecs when DWIMming tracking branches
  t3200.39: tracking setup should fail if there is no matching refspec.
  t7201.24: Add refspec to keep --track working
  t9114.2: Don't use --track option against "svn-remote"-tracking branches
  branch.c: Validate tracking branches with refspecs instead of refs/remotes/*
  glossary: Update and rephrase the definition of a remote-tracking branch

 Documentation/git-checkout.txt     |   6 +-
 Documentation/glossary-content.txt |  13 +++--
 branch.c                           |  17 +++++-
 builtin/checkout.c                 |  42 +++++++-------
 t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh           | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/t3200-branch.sh                  |   8 +--
 t/t7201-co.sh                      |   1 +
 t/t9114-git-svn-dcommit-merge.sh   |   2 +-
 8 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh

-- 
1.8.1.3.704.g33f7d4f
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]