Re: [PATCH] stash: tighten IS_STASH_LIKE logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> The risk of actually closing the door for future developers.  That
>> is a downside of this patch, if we were to apply it.
>
> Okay, no issues.  Drop it.
>
> Consider documenting the fact that IS_STASH_LIKE is merely a
> contextual synonym for IS_MERGE_COMMIT somewhere though.

Documenting what IS_STASH_LIKE means and what it is meant to be used
for would add a lot of value, if it is not done already, but I doubt
it adds much value to document that it _happens to be implemented_
as "is it a merge commit?" in the current version.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]