On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:37:53PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Because this is to help people who are _used_ to seeing "git add" > not take the removals into account, I doubt that "Did I want those > updated or not? Let me see the details of them." will be the > question they will be asking [*1*]. > > I dunno. > > > [Footnote] > > *1* "I know I didn't want to include these removals to the index, > but I learned today that in later Git I should make myself more > clear if I want to keep doing so; thanks for letting me know.", or > "I've long been assuming that I have to say 'git add' and 'git rm' > separately, but I learned today that I can say 'add --all', and in > later Git I do not even have to; thanks for letting me know." are > the two reactions I expected. I am expecting a reaction more like "Hmm, I never thought about it before. Does that make sense to me or not? Let me think about which paths it pertains to and decide". Which I admit is no more likely than the scenarios you outlined, but it is close to what I thought the first time I saw the warning. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html