Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra > <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> why not reuse tag object with some nea header lines? >> >> Or a unified blob, which is currently what we have. The point is to >> have structured parseable information that the object-parsing code of >> git code and easily slurp and give to the rest of git-core. > > I think you misunderstood. I meant instead of introducing new object > type OBJ_LINK, you can reuse tag object and add new header lines for > your purposes. Oh, I interpreted your typo "nea" as "neat", when you meant "new". Yeah, it's worth exploring: I don't know what backward compatibility benefits it will yield yet. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html