Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Test the Git version string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@xxxxxxx> writes:

>> What kind of benefit are you envisioning out of this?
>
> The purpose of tests is to detect mistakes and spot regressions.
>
> A change to the 'git version X.Y.z' string would be a regression, as I
> spotted earlier, as it conflicts with expectations of standard
> programmes such as git-gui.

Sorry, but I do not follow.

A released version says "git version 1.8.2.1".  In a month or so,
I'll have another one that says "git version 1.8.3".  Or I may
decide to bump in preparation for 2.0 and it may identify itself as
"git version 1.9".

Neither of which no existing "program such as git-gui" has ever
seen.

In what way is that a regression?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]