Re: [PATCH 1/3] usage: refactor die-recursion checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:

> I was also tempted to suggest just dropping the recursion check
> altogether. While it is neat to detect such things, it's a "should never
> happen" bug situation, and an infinite loop of printing out the same
> message is pretty easy to notice.

On servers it might be useful to avoid accidentally filling up logs
quickly.

IIUC the context is in the following two threads:

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/182982
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/181421/focus=181443

Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]