Re: [PATCH 1/3] usage: refactor die-recursion checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch teaches die() to print the original die message
> to stderr before reporting the recursion. The custom
> die_routine may or may not have put it the message to

s/put it the/emitted/ perhaps?

> stderr, but this is the best we can do (it is what most
> handlers will do anyway, and it is where our recursion error
> will go).
>
> While we're at it, let's mark the "recursion detected"
> message as a "BUG:", since it should never happen in
> practice. And let's factor out the repeated code in die and
> die_errno. This loses the information of which function was
> called to cause the recursion, but it's important; knowing

Was this supposed to be s/important/unimportant/?

> the actual message fed to the function (which we now do) is
> much more useful, as it can generally pin-point the actual
> call-site that caused the recursion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]