Re: [RFC/PATCH] push: introduce implicit push

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:59 AM, John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So the question is "what is the natural extension of the current
> behaviour?", and the answer for me is "it's completely new", but others
> have different (and conflicting) internal models that give different
> answers.

I don't think this does anybody any service. If the current behavior
is wrong, and if users all over the Internet is any indication, it is;
we do not want to continue such bad behavior. If the new
functionality has a different behavior, it only makes sense to change
the old behavior to make it consistent.

Perpetuating bad behavior choices only hurt the users, we need to
start thinking how to make git more user friendly, not worry too much
about keep doing what we did five years ago.

Sure, we should not break user expectations from one day to the next,
but that doesn't mean we can't change anything ever.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]