Nikolai Weibull wrote: > On 1/16/07, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> But I agree that XML is serious overkill... > > I don't know if it was clear from my first mail, but I wasn't > suggesting --xml as a serious alternative. My point was that if we're > going to go through all the fuss of adding all these switches for > outputting the configuration file in some fixed format, why not go > with one that at least is universal in some sense (not necessarily > XML). And, as Johannes already pointed out, it's very disturbing > having to dump a configuration file so that it is more easily read by > other programs. That would suggest that the ini-based format for > git's configuration file is suboptimal. No, ini-based, or rather ini-like format for git configuration is nice, but I think git is too forgiving in accepting input. Examples: section header and key/value pair in the same line, allowing multiple quotes in in value part. Well, the idea I had was to have --dump switch to git-repo-config to dump init file as if it was created by git-repo-config invocations, without any hand editing (canonical format). -- Jakub Narebski Poland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html