Re: regression: "96b9e0e3 config: treat user and xdg config permission problems as errors" busted git-daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:11:20PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> The --user option to git-daemon would be a good place to do that, I
>> think.  Depending on what other "setuid to less privileged before
>> running" programs do (I do not know offhand), we can say something
>> like this perhaps?
>
> That's a good question. I looked at (just sampling a few off the top of
> my head):
>
>   xinetd
>   openbsd-inetd
>   inetutils-inetd
>   postfix
>   dovecot
>   courier
>
> and none of them sets HOME when dropping privileges. Admittedly some of
> them do not drop privileges immediately in the same way (e.g., the imap
> servers need to remain root so that they can switch to the right user to
> read mail). Postfix does set HOME, but only when actually "becoming" the
> user to do deliveries, not at startup.

Thanks for checking.

For $HOME, it is sufficient to do an unsetenv-equivalent, and I
suspect some of them do just that, though.  Vanilla openbsd-inetd
doesn't, but Debian seems to have a patch to sanitize the
environment, for example.

But still...

> I could also be wrong on one or more of those, as that is from some
> quick grepping, but I think it's clear that the norm is not to set HOME
> alongside setuid (of all of them, I would say git-daemon behaves most
> like the inetd utils, as it does not ever "become" users at all).
>
>>     --user::
>> 	... current description ...
>>     +
>>     (Like|Unlike) many programs that let you run programs as
>>     specified user, the daemon does not reset environment variables
>>     such as $HOME when it runs git programs like upload-pack and
>>     receive-pack. Set and export HOME to point at the home directory
>>     of the user you specify with this option before you start the
>>     daemon, and make sure the Git configuration files in that
>>     directory is readable by that user.
>
> So choosing "Like" here, I think this makes sense.

I would prefer the simplicity ;-)

"Set and export HOME to point at the home directory of the user you
specify with this option" screams that it wants to be rephrased at
me, though.  It somehow sounds as if this option is a way to set and
export the environment variable unless re-read carefully X-<.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]