Adam Spiers <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:09:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Reflowing of the text is very much unappreciated X-<. > > I very much appreciate the excellent job you do as maintainer; your > attention to detail results in an incredibly high quality project. > However I do occasionally find your communication style unnecessarily > abrasive. Maybe that's just me. Sorry for being me X-<. Yeah, I agree that the above came out to be more blunt than needed. It is usually OK to re-flow the text in the paragraph you are touching. After all, for the purpose of reviewing, people can just blindly apply and then ask "diff --color-words". In this case, however, there was some changes that conflict in the vicinity, and reflowing made the resolution unnecessarily more cumbersome. I have briefly looked at this series, but it severely conflicts with a few topics in flight that touch the infrastructure you are using, so I haven't merged it to 'pu'. Perhaps after things calm down, we may want to ask you to reroll on top of updated codebase. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html