Re: [PATCH 1/5] check-ignore: move setup into cmd_check_ignore()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:05:11PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:25:53AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:59:31AM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > -static int check_ignore(const char *prefix, const char **pathspec)
> > > +static int check_ignore(struct path_exclude_check check,
> > > +			const char *prefix, const char **pathspec)
> > 
> > Did you mean to pass the struct by value here? If it is truly a per-path
> > [...]
>
> It's not a per-path value; it's supposed to be reused across checks
> for multiple paths, as explained in the comments above
> last_exclude_matching_path():

Makes sense (I didn't look into it very far, and was just guessing based
on the pass-by-value). Passing a pointer is definitely the right fix,
then.

Thanks.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]